Breakdown:

1. Questioning the Definition of Toxic Masculinity:
   • The passage begins by challenging the term “toxic masculinity” and asking for a clear, precise definition. The speaker expresses a desire to understand what the term specifically refers to, as opposed to concepts like toxic femininity or toxic behavior in general.
2. Concerns About Ambiguity:
   • The speaker points out that discussions surrounding “toxic masculinity” often assume that the phrase inherently has meaning, but when examined closely, it becomes difficult to define. This ambiguity is a central concern, as it makes it challenging to engage in meaningful discourse on the subject.
3. Toxicity in Both Genders:
   • The speaker argues that if toxic masculinity is about crossing boundaries related to gender-appropriate behavior, then such behaviors can be exhibited by both men and women. This leads to the question of whether the term should be expanded to include toxic femininity or even toxic humanity, as toxic behaviors are not exclusive to one gender.
4. The Ethical Assumption of Toxic Masculinity:
   • The argument highlights that there is an ethical expectation to accept “toxic masculinity” as a valid term without much scrutiny. However, the speaker insists that before engaging in serious discussions about it, there must be a clear understanding of what the phrase actually means and how it differs from other forms of toxicity.
5. Pushing Against the Notion:
   • The speaker suggests that if we examine “toxic masculinity” closely, it quickly loses its clarity and usefulness as a concept. The difficulty in defining it in meaningful terms makes it problematic for any serious analysis or discussion.
6. The Importance of Defining Terms:
   • The overall point emphasizes that if we are to have productive conversations about gender-related issues, we must first define our terms clearly. The lack of a concrete definition for “toxic masculinity” weakens the discourse and opens the door for misunderstandings or misapplications of the term.

This breakdown focuses on the critique of “toxic masculinity” as a concept, the challenge of defining it, and the broader implications of discussing gender-related toxicity.