This text is a layered critique of institutional power, colonization, and the suppression of ancient knowledge. It is not just a defense of astrology—it is an argument that astrology was intentionally stolen, repackaged, and then weaponized to control people’s spiritual autonomy. Let’s break it down further.
1. Introduction: A Direct Confrontation with Religious Condemnation
The text immediately sets up a confrontation between astrology and Christianity. The phrase “the moment you bring up astrology, Christians love to shout…” is deliberately provocative. It suggests that religious opposition to astrology is not based on deep theological reasoning but is more of a knee-jerk reaction, rooted in fear rather than understanding.
By framing astrology as “older than your Bible, older than your church, older than your pastor’s entire belief system”, the argument challenges the notion that Christianity holds exclusive spiritual authority. This places astrology in the role of an ancient, pre-colonial system of wisdom, positioning it as something that existed long before religious institutions labeled it as evil.
Strategic Rhetorical Choices:
- “Your pastor’s entire belief system” – This phrasing is personal and direct. It challenges readers to reconsider the legitimacy of what they’ve been taught.
- “Before religion, before colonization, before the cross was ever a symbol” – This sequence dismantles Christianity’s timeline of dominance, emphasizing astrology’s deeper historical roots.
2. Astrology as a Sacred Science: A Legacy of Ancient Civilizations
The text introduces astrology as something far more profound than the modern-day commercialized horoscopes found in newspapers. Instead, it links astrology to major pre-colonial civilizations like:
- Ancient Kemet (Egypt) – Known for its astronomical knowledge, used to align temples, pyramids, and rituals.
- The Dogon Tribe (West Africa) – Famous for their advanced understanding of Sirius B, a star invisible to the naked eye, proving an ancestral connection to the cosmos.
- The Indus Valley & Mesopotamia – The earliest recorded astrologers, who mapped celestial cycles for agriculture, governance, and spirituality.
Key Argument:
Astrology wasn’t a tool for “entertainment” but a sacred science used to understand life cycles, fate, and divine order. The implication here is that colonization, particularly Eurocentric religious expansion, intentionally discredited these indigenous sciences to replace them with institutionalized religious control.
3. Institutional Hypocrisy: The Secret Use of Astrology by Religious and Political Leaders
One of the most powerful arguments in the text is that those who demonize astrology actually use it themselves. This is a bold claim, supported by historical evidence:
- The Vatican’s observatories – The Catholic Church, despite its stance against astrology, has some of the most advanced astronomical observatories in the world.
- Ancient Popes and Kings had personal astrologers – Historical rulers consulted astrology for coronations, battles, and governance.
- Monarchs and Politicians consult birth charts and align events with celestial movements – Many world leaders still quietly follow astrological cycles for major decisions.
Implication:
If astrology was truly “evil,” why did the most powerful religious and political figures secretly rely on it? This suggests a deliberate effort to suppress astrological knowledge among the masses while privately using it to maintain power.
This connects to a broader pattern in history:
- They renamed it. Astrology became “evil” while astronomy (a sanitized version) was acceptable.
- They demonized it. Astrology was associated with witchcraft and heresy.
- They stole it back. Powerful figures continued using astrology in secret.
This is a direct critique of religious gatekeeping, where access to divine knowledge is restricted so that people remain spiritually dependent on the church.
4. The Zodiac: Ancient Archetypes, Not Greek Inventions
This section dismantles the idea that astrology is purely a Western, Greco-Roman concept. Instead, it traces the archetypes of the zodiac back to:
- Africa (Kemet, Dogon astrology)
- Mesopotamia (Babylonian star maps, Sumerian myths)
- India (Vedic astrology, nakshatras, lunar mansions)
Each zodiac sign is given a deeper, pre-colonial significance:
- Aries (Mars, War) → Linked to ancient warrior deities.
- Taurus (Sacred Bull) → Found in Egyptian and Mesopotamian mythology.
- Leo (Solar Royalty) → Symbolized by the lion in African astrology.
- Pisces (Duality, Rebirth) → Rooted in ancient mystical traditions.
Key Argument:
The zodiac was not “invented” by the Greeks and Romans—they simply renamed and absorbed older astrological traditions from Africa and the Middle East. This challenges the Eurocentric narrative of astrology’s history.
5. Colonization, Control, and the Suppression of Cosmic Knowledge
The text moves from historical evidence into a sociopolitical critique, arguing that astrology’s demonization was not random—it was a colonizer’s strategy to control spiritual knowledge.
- Astrology gave people power without permission. If individuals could interpret their own fate, they didn’t need religious intermediaries.
- It offered guidance without guilt. Unlike religious doctrines based on sin and salvation, astrology provided insight without shame.
- It connected people directly to the divine. No need for confession, repentance, or church authority—just alignment with cosmic rhythms.
Core Thesis:
The church doesn’t hate astrology. It hates the idea of you being spiritually independent.
By reframing astrology as “witchcraft” and “evil,” religious institutions could sever people’s connection to their own spiritual inheritance. This is spiritual colonization—where belief systems are not just erased but deliberately replaced with doctrines designed to maintain control.
6. The Final Call to Action: Reclaiming Lost Knowledge
The text ends with a bold and empowering conclusion:
- Horoscopes aren’t evil. What’s evil is the system that erased and repackaged them.
- You weren’t lost. You were deliberately misled.
- Reconnect with your cosmic memory. Learning astrology isn’t about “playing with demons”; it’s about remembering what your ancestors knew.
This is a direct challenge to religious dogma, urging readers to reclaim knowledge that was stolen from them.
Final Implication:
If astrology is truly a tool for empowerment, then the question is: who benefits from keeping people disconnected from it?
Final Analysis: A Decolonial and Spiritual Awakening Argument
This text isn’t just defending astrology—it’s calling for a spiritual decolonization. It argues that religious institutions and colonial forces have worked to:
- Erase pre-Christian spiritual knowledge
- Demonize indigenous wisdom
- Control access to divine understanding
- Keep people dependent on external religious authority
It reframes astrology not as a superstition, but as a lost inheritance—something that was taken away, distorted, and hidden in plain sight.
Why This Resonates:
- It challenges religious dogma directly.
- It provides historical and cultural evidence.
- It empowers people to reclaim lost knowledge.
- It exposes institutional hypocrisy.
This is more than just an argument about astrology—it’s an argument about power, colonization, and spiritual liberation.
Leave a Reply