Lucy Coleman and the Power of Proximity: When White Allyship Meant Showing Up and Staying

Posted by:

|

On:

|

,


Introduction: The Problem with Performative Allyship

The piece opens with a sharp critique of performative white abolitionism—a necessary lens. In much of 19th-century America, white abolitionists were often self-congratulatory, more invested in the moral currency of appearing just than in the real cost of justice. But Lucy Coleman is lifted from that sea of hypocrisy and held up as a rare example of principled, proximity-based allyship.

This framing immediately distinguishes Coleman not by her whiteness or intentions, but by her actions—consistent, sustained, and sacrificial ones.


**1. Proximity Over Performance

“She wasn’t out here leading parades and looking for praise…”

Coleman’s legacy wasn’t forged in front of crowds but in remote, hostile, and often violently racist Southern communities. The narration highlights that her credibility came not from grand gestures or moral posturing, but from her willingness to stay present in Black spaces even when it meant physical danger.

This is a critical historical point: during Reconstruction, white teachers in the South were often targets of racial backlash. For a white woman to not only teach formerly enslaved children but also physically stand between them and white mobs was an act of radical defiance.


**2. From Allyship to Accompaniment

“She showed up to dusty schoolhouses where formerly enslaved children were finally free to learn…”

What makes Coleman’s legacy stand out is that she engaged in what we now call accompaniment—walking with the oppressed rather than speaking for them.

By choosing to teach—not supervise, not document, not moralize—she embraced daily labor, the kind that rarely earns headlines. She became part of the infrastructure of Black freedom rather than just a witness to it.


**3. Staying When It’s Uncomfortable

“When white northerners told her to go home, she said no…”

This is a moment of stark clarity. Coleman defied not just Southern racism, but Northern white liberal fragility—the kind that supported abolition in theory but flinched at true racial integration or Black empowerment.

Her refusal to leave is a powerful metaphor for solidarity: you don’t get to opt out when things get ugly. True allies persist in the face of pushback, even from their own.


**4. Centering the Work, Not the Self

“She never tried to center herself…”

Coleman didn’t publish self-aggrandizing memoirs or bask in post-war fame. Her work was archival, observational, and accountable. She left documentation, not declarations.

This challenges a modern trend: performative allyship on social media or in nonprofit spaces where white “wokeness” is often rewarded. Coleman didn’t need to be seen doing the work; she just did the work.


**5. The Philosophy of Solidarity

“My sympathy is not for a race or a class, but for the whole world…”

This quote illustrates Coleman’s universalist ethic, but the narrator is careful to clarify: she didn’t use this as a shield to avoid specific advocacy. She acted through the particular to serve the universal.

Unlike many modern “colorblind” progressives who dilute racial justice under the guise of humanism, Coleman’s sympathy had teeth—it wasn’t abstract. It moved her body, her resources, and her moral compass directly into the fire.


**6. Justice Requires Proximity, Sacrifice, and Accountability

This final summation is both elegant and deeply informed. It’s a direct answer to modern conversations around allyship:

  • Proximity means showing up—not just for photo ops, but consistently and in dangerous spaces.
  • Sacrifice means giving something up: comfort, reputation, safety.
  • Accountability means not making yourself the hero, but checking your own people and amplifying the truth.

Conclusion: Why Lucy Coleman Matters Today

In a time where allyship is often diluted by aesthetics, hashtags, and DEI checkboxes, Coleman reminds us of an older and rarer model—one forged in physical proximity to risk and rooted in principled humility.

Her story forces us to reconsider what it means to be a true accomplice in the struggle for justice. She didn’t need to be perfect. She needed to be present. And that’s a lesson many still haven’t learned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!