Streamlined Narrative
The viral “skinny-talk” trend—videos glamorizing extreme calorie restriction and size-2 fantasies—isn’t harmless fitness inspo; it is the digital echo of a 200-year-old colonial worldview that branded Black femininity as grotesque and demanded that white womanhood shrink itself in contrast. The template was Sarah Baartman, a Khoikhoi woman trafficked to Europe in 1810, stripped, caged, ogled, dissected, and displayed for her curves. Europeans called her the “Hottentot Venus,” pairing a racial slur with the goddess of beauty to ridicule the very idea that her full figure could be desirable. Her exhibition crystallized two obsessions that still shape culture: the fetishizing of Black bodies and the simultaneous mandate that “civilized” women make themselves the opposite—small, corseted, calorie-starved.
Detailed Breakdown
| Historical Root | Mechanism Then | Modern Manifestation |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah Baartman Sideshow (1810-1815) | Public display of her hips/buttocks as evidence of Black “primitivism.” | Social media fixation on “slim thick” or “BBL” curves on non-Black influencers, while policing the same traits on Black women. |
| Victorian Corsetry | White women crushed ribs to dramatize tiny waists, defining “refined” femininity against Baartman’s silhouette. | #SkinnyTok challenges, waist-trainer sales, and “clean girl” aesthetics valorizing minimal inches over health. |
| Quetelet’s BMI (1830s) | Statistical tool built on European male bodies becomes universal yardstick. | Doctors pathologize diverse bodies; insurance and wellness apps still anchor to BMI cut-offs. |
| Colonial Medical Spectacle | Baartman’s body dissected; genitals kept in jars until 1974 museum removal. | Diet industry dissects women via macro counts, fat scans, and “before/after” slides—data-driven surveillance of flesh. |
Expert Analysis
- Colonial Gaze to Algorithmic Gaze
- Then: paying for a ticket to stare at Baartman.
- Now: infinite scroll monetizes likes, views, and ads on bodies curated for consumption. The profit logic is identical—spectator desire funds the system.
- Fear-Fetish Cycle
- Sociology terms this “repulsion-attraction duality.” Baartman’s curves were condemned as deviant yet obsessively examined. Today the cycle repeats: curvy aesthetics explode in fashion, but Black girls get dress-coded for the same shapes.
- Restriction as Respectability
- Public-health research (Strings, 2019) shows weight-loss prescriptions skyrocket among women of color, mapping moral worth to pounds lost. Shrinking is social compliance, not wellness.
- Digital Disordered Eating
- Clinical psychologists flag TikTok thin-spo content as a super-spread vector for eating disorders. The platform’s AI amplifies extreme-diet videos once users linger—an automated corset tightening around attention.
Final Takeaway
When an influencer counts almonds on #SkinnyTok, she performs a ritual first scripted to deny Sarah Baartman’s right to take up space. Recognize the lineage: diet culture is not merely about health; it is the aftershock of colonial violence that still ranks bodies by proximity to an invented ideal. Liberation starts with rejecting the mandate to “disappear” and reclaiming the fullness—literal and cultural—that Baartman was punished for possessing. Colonial body politics thrive on epistemic enclosure—the idea that only certain bodies are standard and all others must orbit or erase themselves. Each time you silence a hunger cue, apologize for your hips in a photo, or measure self-worth by a calorie dashboard, you re-enact a cage first built for Sarah Baartman. True resistance is not just loving your body; it is politically re-inhabiting space—physical, digital, historical—that was denied. Expansion, not reduction, is the radical act.
Leave a Reply