Game of Inches: Celtics Need Paint Pressure, Knicks Need Brunson’s Poise

Posted by:

|

On:

|

,

By Alvin Harris, May 7, 2025

Game 1 belonged to New York.

The Knicks walked into TD Garden and stole Game 1 from a Celtics team favored to win the series and reach the Finals. Now, with both Boston and OKC listed as double-digit favorites in Game 2, Vegas is betting the upsets were flukes. Game 1 delivered two major shocks—upsets by the Knicks and a Western underdog. Yet Vegas remains confident, backing Boston and OKC with wide spreads in Game 2. Behind the noise, the stats and strategies reveal a more nuanced battle unfolding.

But if these playoffs have shown us anything, it’s this: predict at your own risk.

🎯 ANALYTICAL BREAKDOWN:

1. Kristaps Porziņģis: The Wild Card

  • Status: Probable for Game 2, but still recovering from an illness that’s lingered since February/March.
  • Impact: He’s clearly not 100%. His playoff numbers are woeful (32% FG, 2-17 from 3), pointing to fatigue and possibly compromised lung capacity (upper respiratory).
  • Strategic Implication: Porziņģis’ role as a floor spacer and secondary rim protector is diminished. Boston may need to lean more on Al Horford’s switch defense and Tatum’s downhill drives.

2. Celtics Offense: Live by the 3, Die by the 3

  • Game 1: NBA postseason record 63 three-point attempts — and another record 45 misses.
  • Coaching Philosophy: Joe Mazzulla remains unapologetic. Even after admitting 8–10 poor shot selections, he doubled down on the strategy. The team believes open looks are process wins, not failures.
  • Adjustment?: Don’t expect fewer threes. Do expect better threes—specifically:
    • Off paint touches.
    • From inside-out ball movement rather than pull-ups.
    • Corner threes over wing/deep contested ones.

3. Paint Touches: The Missing Ingredient

  • Key Tactical Note: Celtics were too perimeter-oriented.
  • Why it matters:
    • Driving into the paint forces defensive rotation.
    • Creates 2-on-1 scenarios on the weak side.
    • Opens up corner shooters like Derrick White and Payton Pritchard.
    • Tatum and Brown are best when they collapse the defense — not just when jacking threes off the bounce.
  • Comparison: Knicks got better shots by collapsing Boston’s defense and making “good to great” passes.

4. Jalen Brunson: Mr. Clutch

  • Stats: Leads all playoff players in clutch scoring (35 points, nearly double the next).
  • Game 1 Impact:
    • Late-game assassin.
    • Attacks mismatches: Even Al Horford got danced on.
    • Draws in defenders and kicks out — a mature floor general.
  • Film Breakdown:
    • Uses body well, finishes through contact.
    • Not afraid of physicality or the moment.
    • Slows the game down in clutch, creating chaos with pace control.
  • Boston’s Concern: If the game stays close, it becomes Brunson’s game to win.

5. The Knicks’ Synergy and Simplicity

  • Execution:
    • Drive-and-kick game is sharp.
    • Bigs screen with purpose (e.g., Isaiah Hartenstein and Josh Hart creating angles).
    • No wasted movement.
  • Role Players:
    • Quick decisions. Bridges, Hart, DiVincenzo — all making the extra pass.
    • They don’t need volume, just decisiveness.

6. Thunder & Celtics Both as Double-Digit Favorites

  • Vegas Belief: Game 1 upsets won’t be repeated.
  • Why?
    • Regression to the mean for shooters.
    • Celtics are unlikely to miss 45 threes again.
    • Thunder likely to ramp up defensive pressure at home.

🔍 FINAL TAKEAWAY:

This is not just about shots going in or not. It’s about:

  • Where those shots come from.
  • When they come in the shot clock.
  • And who’s generating them.

For Boston, the key is intentionality in the paint, and for New York, it’s keeping the game within clutch range—where Brunson becomes a demigod.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!