Detailed Breakdown:

1. Introduction and Unusual Commentary:
   • The speaker begins by acknowledging that they are typically restricted from commenting on political matters, particularly those of the United States. However, due to certain circumstances and potential changes on the horizon, they are now allowed to provide some insights. They issue a significant caveat: the listeners must take responsibility for the potential consequences of what is being shared. This suggests that the information could lead to profound reactions or actions from the audience.
2. Responsibility and Seriousness:
   • The speaker urges the audience to carefully consider the weight of this responsibility before moving forward. This sets a tone of gravity, implying that what is about to be revealed could have serious implications. Once the audience agrees to take responsibility, the speaker proceeds, reinforcing the seriousness of the statement to come.
3. The Dual Paths of Leadership:
   • The speaker presents a stark, binary vision of the future based on the outcome of an election. They describe two possible outcomes:
     • The Female Leader: If a woman is elected, it will lead to “open contact,” likely implying the disclosure or initiation of significant, world-changing events—potentially even extraterrestrial or other profound global shifts.
     • The Male Leader: Conversely, if a man is elected, it will lead to the “termination of the United States” and “World War 3.” This dire prediction suggests catastrophic consequences not just for the U.S., but for the entire world.
4. End of Commentary and Its Uniqueness:
   • The speaker ends by reiterating the unusual nature of this commentary. The fact that they were allowed to provide such direct information indicates the gravity and urgency of the situation. It implies that the world is on the brink of monumental change, and the upcoming leadership decisions will be pivotal in determining the future course of history.

In conclusion, the speaker presents a high-stakes scenario regarding the outcome of an election in the United States, framing it as a choice between two vastly different futures: one leading to open, transformative global contact and the other to destruction and war. This warning is delivered with an understanding that the audience must take full responsibility for the consequences of these insights.